On 17/10/2018 17:04, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> + union {
>> + __u32 pad;
>> + __u32 pio;
>> + };
>> };
> I was just passing by, but what's the point in keeping 'pad'?
>
Backwards compatibility. QEMU does have a couple instances of "x.pad =
0", so...
Paolo
