On 13/10/2018 16:54, lantianyu1986@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Lan Tianyu <Tianyu.Lan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> If ept table pointers are mismatched, flushing tlb for each vcpus via
> hv flush interface still helps to reduce vmexits which are triggered
> by IPI and INEPT emulation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <Tianyu.Lan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 15 ++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index 6f44d3a63434..8ff13f3aed11 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -1571,7 +1571,8 @@ static void check_ept_pointer_match(struct kvm *kvm)
>
> static int vmx_hv_remote_flush_tlb(struct kvm *kvm)
> {
> - int ret;
> + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> + int ret = -ENOTSUPP, i;
>
> spin_lock(&to_kvm_vmx(kvm)->ept_pointer_lock);
>
> @@ -1579,14 +1580,14 @@ static int vmx_hv_remote_flush_tlb(struct kvm *kvm)
> check_ept_pointer_match(kvm);
>
> if (to_kvm_vmx(kvm)->ept_pointers_match != EPT_POINTERS_MATCH) {
> - ret = -ENOTSUPP;
> - goto out;
> + kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm)
> + ret |= hyperv_flush_guest_mapping(
> + to_vmx(kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, i))->ept_pointer);
> + } else {
> + ret = hyperv_flush_guest_mapping(
> + to_vmx(kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, 0))->ept_pointer);
> }
>
> - ret = hyperv_flush_guest_mapping(
> - to_vmx(kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, 0))->ept_pointer);
> -
> -out:
> spin_unlock(&to_kvm_vmx(kvm)->ept_pointer_lock);
> return ret;
> }
>
I think this is an independent change that can be applied separately?
Thanks,
Paolo
