On 10/10/2018 07:55, Paul Mackerras wrote: > > Stephen Rothwell noted that there is a conflict between my > kvm-ppc-next tree and the kvm-arm tree, in that we have both allocated > the next free capability number (160). It would be nice to get a > stable allocation for the new capability that I need (one which > reports/enables nested virtualization support for the HV KVM module) > so that the necessary QEMU patches can be submitted. Since you sent the pull request first, you get to use 160. :) Paolo
