On 28/09/2018 10:32, Thomas Huth wrote: > Compiling with -Wmissing-prototypes and -Wstrict-prototypes should help > us to make sure that implementations always match the prototypes in > the headers, so we hopefully can avoid some bugs in the future this way. > > Thomas Huth (4): > x86: Declare local functions as "static" and specify argument types > x86: Add missing prototypes and mark more local functions as static > s390x: Make code compilable with -Wmissing-prototypes and > -Wstrict-prototypes > Makefile: Compile with -Wmissing-prototypes and -Wstrict-prototypes > > Makefile | 1 + > lib/s390x/asm/float.h | 2 +- > lib/s390x/mmu.c | 1 + > lib/x86/desc.c | 5 +++++ > lib/x86/setup.c | 4 +++- > x86/cmpxchg8b.c | 2 +- > x86/eventinj.c | 6 ++++-- > x86/kvmclock.c | 11 ++++++----- > x86/pku.c | 3 ++- > x86/smap.c | 1 + > x86/taskswitch2.c | 12 +++++++----- > x86/tsc.c | 4 ++-- > x86/umip.c | 6 +++--- > x86/vmx.c | 6 +++--- > 14 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) > Applied, thanks. Paolo
