On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 01:14:21PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 06/15/2009 01:11 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 01:03:39PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: >> >>> On 06/14/2009 01:52 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote: >>> >>>> Instead of having special case in vcpu event loop. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> I'm a little worried about two vcpus INITing each other simultaneously >>> and deadlocking. INIT/SIPI are async events, the initiator should not >>> wait for them. >>> >>> >> I thought to add on_vcpu_async() for that (if this case is worth warring about). >> > > A generic on_vcpu_async() would need to allocate, that might be expoitable. > Then what about processing events while waiting in on_vcpu()? -- Gleb. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
