On 09/06/2018 01:33 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 08:54:52AM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
My thought was that we could simply define a second array for the SEV
case to statically allocate for NR_CPUS since __decrypted has a big
chunk of memory that would be ununsed anyways[1]. And since the second
array is only used for SEV it can be freed if !SEV.
Lemme see if I get it straight:
__decrypted:
4K
__decrypted_XXX:
((num_possible_cpus() * 32) / 4K) pages
__decrypted_end:
Am I close?
Yes.
