Re: [PATCH v9 07/22] KVM: s390: refactor crypto initialization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/20/2018 04:41 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
+	if (test_kvm_cpu_feat(vcpu->kvm, KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_AP))
+		vcpu->arch.sie_block->eca |= ECA_APIE;
- vcpu->arch.sie_block->crycbd = vcpu->kvm->arch.crypto.crycbd;
+	/* If MSAX3 is installed on the guest, set up protected key support */
+	if (test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 76)) {
+		if (vcpu->kvm->arch.crypto.aes_kw)
+			vcpu->arch.sie_block->ecb3 |= ECB3_AES;
+		if (vcpu->kvm->arch.crypto.dea_kw)
+			vcpu->arch.sie_block->ecb3 |= ECB3_DEA;
+	}
As the feature can never change, and aes_kw/dea_kw are only set to 1 in
case we have test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 76), this change is not needed.

I think this function can be pretty much left alone. Just add the
KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_AP handling.
I disagree, what about the case where the KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_AP is
configured for the guest but the MSAX3 facility (76) is not?
Then aes_kw/dea_kw can never be set.

kvm_s390_vm_set_crypto() and kvm_s390_crypto_init() correctly test for
facility 76.

Or am I missing a case?

I stand corrected, you are right. I'll remove the test.


   }
void kvm_s390_vcpu_unsetup_cmma(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)






[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux