In the documentation description, this capability's name is KVM_CAP_ARM_SET_SERROR_ESR, but in the header file this capability's name is KVM_CAP_ARM_INJECT_SERROR_ESR, so change the documentation description to make it same. Signed-off-by: Dongjiu Geng <gengdongjiu@xxxxxxxxxx> --- In the Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt: +8.19 KVM_CAP_ARM_SET_SERROR_ESR In the include/uapi/linux/kvm.h: +#define KVM_CAP_ARM_INJECT_SERROR_ESR 156 So in above two files, the capability's name is not same, it is better to use a same name. --- Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt index 0acdbac..c664064 100644 --- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt +++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt @@ -909,10 +909,10 @@ Serviceability (RAS) Specification"). SError exceptions always have an ESR value. Some CPUs have the ability to specify what the virtual SError's ESR value should be. These systems will -advertise KVM_CAP_ARM_SET_SERROR_ESR. In this case exception.has_esr will +advertise KVM_CAP_ARM_INJECT_SERROR_ESR. In this case exception.has_esr will always have a non-zero value when read, and the agent making an SError pending should specify the ISS field in the lower 24 bits of exception.serror_esr. If -the system supports KVM_CAP_ARM_SET_SERROR_ESR, but user-space sets the events +the system supports KVM_CAP_ARM_INJECT_SERROR_ESR, but user-space sets the events with exception.has_esr as zero, KVM will choose an ESR. Specifying exception.has_esr on a system that does not support it will return @@ -4749,7 +4749,7 @@ hypercalls: HvFlushVirtualAddressSpace, HvFlushVirtualAddressSpaceEx, HvFlushVirtualAddressList, HvFlushVirtualAddressListEx. -8.19 KVM_CAP_ARM_SET_SERROR_ESR +8.19 KVM_CAP_ARM_INJECT_SERROR_ESR Architectures: arm, arm64 -- 2.7.4
