Hi Gerd, Can I know your status on the boot display support work? I'm interested to try it in some real use cases. Thanks, Henry > -----Original Message----- > From: intel-gvt-dev [mailto:intel-gvt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On > Behalf Of Gerd Hoffmann > Sent: Monday, May 7, 2018 2:26 PM > To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Neo Jia <cjia@xxxxxxxxxx>; kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Erik Skultety > <eskultet@xxxxxxxxxx>; libvirt <libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx>; Dr. David Alan > Gilbert <dgilbert@xxxxxxxxxx>; Zhang, Tina <tina.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>; Kirti > Wankhede <kwankhede@xxxxxxxxxx>; Laine Stump <laine@xxxxxxxxxx>; > Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>; Jiri Denemark > <jdenemar@xxxxxxxxxx>; intel-gvt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Expose vfio device display/migration to libvirt and above, was Re: > [PATCH 0/3] sample: vfio mdev display devices. > > Hi, > > > This raises another question, is the configuration of the emulated > > graphics a factor in the handling the mdev device's display option? > > AFAIK, neither vGPU vendor provides a VBIOS for boot graphics, so even > > with a display option, we're mostly targeting a secondary graphics > > head, otherwise the user will be running headless until the guest OS > > drivers initialize. > > Right now yes, no boot display for vgpu devices. I'm trying to fix that with > ramfb. There are a bunch of rough edges still and details to hashed out. It'll > probably be uefi only. > > cheers, > Gerd
