Re: [PATCH v3 9/9] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Update documentation of the GICv2 device

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 09:52:04AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 14/07/18 18:05, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > Update the documentation to reflect the ordering requirements of
> > restoring GICv2 distributor registers and remove outdated limitations in
> > the documentation while we're at it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/arm-vgic.txt | 12 ++++++------
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/arm-vgic.txt b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/arm-vgic.txt
> > index b3ce126..c9a6393 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/arm-vgic.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/arm-vgic.txt
> > @@ -49,9 +49,12 @@ Groups:
> >      index is specified with the vcpu_index field.  Note that most distributor
> >      fields are not banked, but return the same value regardless of the
> >      vcpu_index used to access the register.
> > -  Limitations:
> > -    - Priorities are not implemented, and registers are RAZ/WI
> > -    - Currently only implemented for KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V2.
> > +
> > +    GICD_IIDR.Revision is updated when the KVM implementation of an emulated
> > +    GICv2 is changed.  Userspace should read GICD_IIDR from KVM and write back
> > +    the read value to confirm its expected behavior is aligned with the KVM
> > +    implementation.  To properly restore the interrupt group configuration,
> > +    GICD_IIDR should be written before any other registers.
>
> I'd like to make it crystal clear that writing to IIDR doesn't allow to
> select a behaviour, and is merely a confirmation that host and guest do
> agree on either revision 0 (no write) or revision n (n being read and
> written back).
>

But that's not really true though, because userspace can read rev 0, and
still have "no write", or read and write n for n >= 1 and have "write".

I guess I'm not completely sure which wording you'd like me to add?

Thanks,
-Christoffer
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux