On Fri, 6 Jul 2018, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 06/07/2018 18:13, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > @@ -241,6 +269,9 @@ void __init kvmclock_init(void) > > return; > > } > > > > + if (!hypervisor_is_type(X86_HYPER_KVM)) > > + kvmclock_vsyscall = 0; > > + > > No need for this; by the time you get here, the condition will always be > true. And if you don't have kvmclock, hv_clock will be NULL and > initialization will be skipped anyway in kvm_setup_vsyscall_timeinfo. Right, stupid me.
