Re: [patch 3/7] x86/kvmclock: Decrapify kvm_register_clock()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Decrapification went a bit too far...

On 06/07/2018 18:13, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> -	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> -	int low, high, ret;
>  	struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info *src;
> +	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> +	u64 pa;
>  
>  	if (!hv_clock)
> -		return 0;
> -
> -	src = &hv_clock[cpu].pvti;

... the line above should not have been a "-".  That, or initialize it
in the declaration.  Whoever applies can fix it, no need to repost.
I'll test with the above fix.

Paolo

> -	low = (int)slow_virt_to_phys(src) | 1;
> -	high = ((u64)slow_virt_to_phys(src) >> 32);
> -	ret = native_write_msr_safe(msr_kvm_system_time, low, high);
> -	printk(KERN_INFO "kvm-clock: cpu %d, msr %x:%x, %s\n",
> -	       cpu, high, low, txt);
> +		return;
>  
> -	return ret;
> +	pa = slow_virt_to_phys(src) | 0x01ULL;
> +	wrmsrl(msr_kvm_system_time, pa);
> +	pr_info("kvm-clock: cpu %d, msr %llx, %s\n", cpu, pa, txt);
>  }




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux