On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 02:45:54PM -0300, Glauber Costa wrote:
> duplicated save config.
>
> > diff --git a/hw/virtio.h b/hw/virtio.h
> > index 04a3c3d..ce05517 100644
> > --- a/hw/virtio.h
> > +++ b/hw/virtio.h
> > @@ -72,6 +72,10 @@ typedef struct VirtQueueElement
> >
> > typedef struct {
> > void (*notify)(void * opaque, uint16_t vector);
> > + void (*save_config)(void * opaque, QEMUFile *f);
> > + void (*save_queue)(void * opaque, int n, QEMUFile *f);
> > + int (*load_config)(void * opaque, QEMUFile *f);
> > + int (*load_queue)(void * opaque, int n, QEMUFile *f);
> > } VirtIOBindings;
> >
> So, what's the overall effect on a virtual machine that gets migrated,
> of a certain device not implementing one of those functions?
Those are implemented by a transport (e.g. virtio_pci) not the device.
> Will it work? Will it break?
It will work - assuming there's nothing transport-specific you need to
save and load. If there is - this patch is not breaking anything
that isn't already broken ...
--
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
