On 19/06/2018 19:08, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
>> This one really makes the code uglier though, so I'm not really inclined
>> to applying the patch.
> Note that of the three variables (w, u, x), only u is used later on.
> What about declaring them as negated with the cast, that way there's
> no cast in a ternary?
I still find it inferior, but I guess it's at least acceptable. I
prefer not_{x,w,u} though. :)
Paolo
