On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 10:42:51AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > There is very little point in trying to support the 32bit KVM/arm API > on arm64, and this was never an anticipated use case. > > Let's make it clear by not selecting KVM_COMPAT. Do any other architectures have KVM && COMPAT, and expose an incompatible ABI to COMPAT tasks? > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx> Given the state of arm/arm64, this makes sense to me. FWIW: Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> > --- > virt/kvm/Kconfig | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/virt/kvm/Kconfig b/virt/kvm/Kconfig > index 72143cfaf6ec..ea434ddc8499 100644 > --- a/virt/kvm/Kconfig > +++ b/virt/kvm/Kconfig > @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ config KVM_GENERIC_DIRTYLOG_READ_PROTECT > > config KVM_COMPAT > def_bool y > - depends on KVM && COMPAT && !S390 > + depends on KVM && COMPAT && !(S390 || ARM64) > > config HAVE_KVM_IRQ_BYPASS > bool > -- > 2.17.1 >
