On 06/14/2018 02:34 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
Looking at the other architectures, I just recently learnt that it is better to mark missing CPU functionality as SKIP instead of reporting an expected failure. Thus let's replace the report_xfail() calls in the s390x code with report_skip(). Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth<thuth@xxxxxxxxxx> --- s390x/cmm.c | 5 +++-- s390x/gs.c | 5 +++-- s390x/iep.c | 5 +++-- s390x/pfmf.c | 5 +++-- s390x/sthyi.c | 5 +++-- s390x/vector.c | 15 +++++++++------ 6 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Farhan Ali <alifm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
