On 2018/6/12 23:29, James Morse wrote:
> Hi gengdongjiu,
>
> On 12/06/18 15:50, gengdongjiu wrote:
>> On 2018/6/11 21:36, James Morse wrote:
>>> On 08/06/18 20:48, Dongjiu Geng wrote:
>>>> For the migrating VMs, user space may need to know the exception
>>>> state. For example, in the machine A, KVM make an SError pending,
>>>> when migrate to B, KVM also needs to pend an SError.
>>>>
>>>> This new IOCTL exports user-invisible states related to SError.
>>>> Together with appropriate user space changes, user space can get/set
>>>> the SError exception state to do migrate/snapshot/suspend.
>
>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>>>> index caae484..c3e6975 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>>>> @@ -124,6 +124,18 @@ struct kvm_sync_regs {
>>>> struct kvm_arch_memory_slot {
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> +/* for KVM_GET/SET_VCPU_EVENTS */
>>>> +struct kvm_vcpu_events {
>>>> + struct {
>>>> + __u8 serror_pending;
>>>> + __u8 serror_has_esr;
>>>> + /* Align it to 8 bytes */
>>>> + __u8 pad[6];
>>>> + __u64 serror_esr;
>>>> + } exception;
>>>> + __u32 reserved[12];
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>
>>> You haven't defined __KVM_HAVE_VCPU_EVENTS for 32bit, so presumably this struct
>>> will never be used. Why is it here?
>
>> if not add it for 32 bits. the 32 arm platform will build Fail, whether you have good
>> idea to avoid this Failure if not add this struct for the 32 bit?
>
> How does this 32bit code build without this patch?
> If do you provide the struct, how will that code build with older headers?
>
> As far as I can see, this is what the __KVM_HAVE_VCPU_EVENTS define is for.
>
> This should be both, or neither. Having just the struct is useless.
It because the caller of kvm_arm_vcpu_get/set_events() is in "virt/kvm/arm/arm.c".
the virt/kvm/arm/arm.c will used by both arm64 and arm.
so It needs to add kvm_arm_vcpu_get/set_events() for the 32 bits, however, kvm_arm_vcpu_get/set_events() will directly return,
I attached the build erros below:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/6/4/918
https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/6/4/873
[..]
I will continue check below comments, thanks
