On Mon, 2018-05-21 at 17:54 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> The X86_FEATURE_SSBD is an synthetic CPU feature - that is
> it bit location has no relevance to the real CPUID 0x7.EBX[31]
> bit position. For that we need the new CPU feature name.
>
> Fixes: 52817587e706 ("x86/cpufeatures: Disentangle SSBD enumeration")
>
> CC: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> index ced851169730..598461e24be3 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> @@ -407,8 +407,8 @@ static inline int __do_cpuid_ent(struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry, u32 function,
>
> /* cpuid 7.0.edx*/
> const u32 kvm_cpuid_7_0_edx_x86_features =
> - F(AVX512_4VNNIW) | F(AVX512_4FMAPS) | F(SPEC_CTRL) | F(SSBD) |
> - F(ARCH_CAPABILITIES);
> + F(AVX512_4VNNIW) | F(AVX512_4FMAPS) | F(SPEC_CTRL) |
> + F(SPEC_CTRL_SSBD) | F(ARCH_CAPABILITIES);
>
> /* all calls to cpuid_count() should be made on the same cpu */
> get_cpu();
For 4.9-stable, guest_cpuid_has_spec_ctrl() needs a similar fix.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
It is easier to change the specification to fit the program
than vice versa.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
