On 09.05.2018 16:12, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Fix the bug reported by Dan and refactore it so also I can understand
> easily again what the code I've written does.
>
> We will have to decide if patch #1 is CC material. It will not happen with
> KVM guests (as we always have an offset for the itdba so we can't have
> 4G alignemnt).
Thanks, applied.
Patch #1 got an:
Fixes: 166ecb3 ("KVM: s390: vsie: support transactional execution")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # v4.8+
>
> v1 -> v2:
> - use 2 * PAGE_SIZE instead of 8192
>
> David Hildenbrand (2):
> KVM: s390: vsie: fix < 8k check for the itdba
> KVM: s390: vsie: simplify < 8k address checks
>
> arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
