Re: [PATCH RFC v2 3/5] KVM: nVMX: add enlightened VMCS state

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/05/2018 15:37, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> -	if (enable_shadow_vmcs)
> -		to_vmx(vcpu)->nested.sync_shadow_vmcs = true;
> +
> +	if (vmx->nested.hv_evmcs)
> +		vmx->nested.sync_enlightened_vmcs = true;
> +	else if (enable_shadow_vmcs)
> +		vmx->nested.sync_shadow_vmcs = true;
>  }

These four lines are a bit repeated.  Perhaps change them to

	if (enable_shadow_vmcs || vmx->nested.hv_evmcs)
		vmx->nested.need_vmcs12_sync = true;

and elsewhere

	if (vmx->nested.need_vmcs12_sync) {
	       if (vmx->nested.hv_evmcs) {
	               copy_vmcs12_to_enlightened(vmx);
	               /* All fields are clean */
	               vmx->nested.hv_evmcs->hv_clean_fields |=
				HV_VMX_ENLIGHTENED_CLEAN_FIELD_ALL;
			vmx->nested.sync_enlightened_vmcs = false;
		} else {
	                copy_vmcs12_to_shadow(vmx);
		}
		vmx->nested.need_vmcs12_sync = false;
	}

?



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux