Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] KVM: s390: vsie: simplify < 8k address checks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 05/02/2018 04:28 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 02.05.2018 14:42, Heiko Carstens wrote:
>> On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 01:08:14PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> This makes it certainly more readable.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c | 10 +++++-----
>>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c b/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
>>> index 969882b54266..7c51a9dc0ec8 100644
>>> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
>>> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
>>> @@ -557,7 +557,7 @@ static int pin_blocks(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vsie_page *vsie_page)
>>>  	if (test_kvm_cpu_feat(vcpu->kvm, KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_64BSCAO))
>>>  		gpa |= (u64) READ_ONCE(scb_o->scaoh) << 32;
>>>  	if (gpa) {
>>> -		if (!(gpa & ~0x1fffUL))
>>> +		if (gpa < 8192)
>>
>> 2 * PAGE_SIZE, please. That's how it is done on various other places too.
>>
> 
> Christian, does the documentation use the wording "lowcore" or "8192" / 8k?
> 
> If it is lowcore, I agree to use 2 * PAGE_SIZE. If not, I prefer it to
> directly match documentation.
> 
> Anyhow, I leave this decision to Janosch and Christian. Thanks for
> having alook!
> 
prefix area and reverse prefix area. 
In fact what we check here is actually the reversed prefix area so for completeness we
would need an additional check.




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux