Moreover, if the VMLAUNCH/VMRESUME is in 32-bit PAE mode, then the PDPTRs should not be reloaded. On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 10:44 AM, Jim Mattson <jmattson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I realize now that this fix isn't quite right, since it loads > vmcs12->host_cr3 rather than reverting to the CR3 that was loaded at the > time of VMLAUNCH/VMRESUME. In the case of VMfailValid(VM entry with invalid > VMX-control field(s)), none of the VMCS12 host state fields should be > loaded. See the pseudocode for VMLAUNCH/VMRESUME in volume 3 of the SDM. > > > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 1:47 PM Jim Mattson <jmattson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> I realize now that there are actually many other problems with >> deferring some control field checks to the hardware VM-entry of >> vmcs02. When there is an invalid control field, the vCPU should just >> fall through to the next instruction, without any state modifiation >> other than the ALU flags and the VM-instruction error field of the >> current VMCS. However, in preparation for the hardware VM-entry of >> vmcs02, we have already changed quite a bit of the vCPU state: the >> MSRs on the VM-entry MSR-load list, DR7, IA32_DEBUGCTL, the entire >> FLAGS register, etc. All of these changes should be undone, and we're >> not prepared to do that. (For instance, what was the old DR7 value >> that needs to be restored?) > > >> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 5:07 PM, Krish Sadhukhan >> <krish.sadhukhan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On 11/02/2017 05:50 PM, Wanpeng Li wrote: >> > >> >> From: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> >> >> Commit 4f350c6dbcb (kvm: nVMX: Handle deferred early VMLAUNCH/VMRESUME >> >> failure >> >> properly) can result in L1(run kvm-unit-tests/run_tests.sh vmx_controls >> in >> >> L1) >> >> null pointer deference and also L0 calltrace when EPT=0 on both L0 and >> L1. >> >> >> >> In L1: >> >> >> >> BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffffffc015bf8f >> >> IP: vmx_vcpu_run+0x202/0x510 [kvm_intel] >> >> PGD 146e13067 P4D 146e13067 PUD 146e15067 PMD 3d2686067 PTE 3d4af9161 >> >> Oops: 0003 [#1] PREEMPT SMP >> >> CPU: 2 PID: 1798 Comm: qemu-system-x86 Not tainted 4.14.0-rc4+ #6 >> >> RIP: 0010:vmx_vcpu_run+0x202/0x510 [kvm_intel] >> >> Call Trace: >> >> WARNING: kernel stack frame pointer at ffffb86f4988bc18 in >> >> qemu-system-x86:1798 has bad value 0000000000000002 >> >> >> >> In L0: >> >> >> >> -----------[ cut here ]------------ >> >> WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 4460 at >> /home/kernel/linux/arch/x86/kvm//vmx.c:9845 >> >> vmx_inject_page_fault_nested+0x130/0x140 [kvm_intel] >> >> CPU: 6 PID: 4460 Comm: qemu-system-x86 Tainted: G OE >> >> 4.14.0-rc7+ #25 >> >> RIP: 0010:vmx_inject_page_fault_nested+0x130/0x140 [kvm_intel] >> >> Call Trace: >> >> paging64_page_fault+0x500/0xde0 [kvm] >> >> ? paging32_gva_to_gpa_nested+0x120/0x120 [kvm] >> >> ? nonpaging_page_fault+0x3b0/0x3b0 [kvm] >> >> ? __asan_storeN+0x12/0x20 >> >> ? paging64_gva_to_gpa+0xb0/0x120 [kvm] >> >> ? paging64_walk_addr_generic+0x11a0/0x11a0 [kvm] >> >> ? lock_acquire+0x2c0/0x2c0 >> >> ? vmx_read_guest_seg_ar+0x97/0x100 [kvm_intel] >> >> ? vmx_get_segment+0x2a6/0x310 [kvm_intel] >> >> ? sched_clock+0x1f/0x30 >> >> ? check_chain_key+0x137/0x1e0 >> >> ? __lock_acquire+0x83c/0x2420 >> >> ? kvm_multiple_exception+0xf2/0x220 [kvm] >> >> ? debug_check_no_locks_freed+0x240/0x240 >> >> ? debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x20 >> >> ? __lock_is_held+0x9e/0x100 >> >> kvm_mmu_page_fault+0x90/0x180 [kvm] >> >> kvm_handle_page_fault+0x15c/0x310 [kvm] >> >> ? __lock_is_held+0x9e/0x100 >> >> handle_exception+0x3c7/0x4d0 [kvm_intel] >> >> vmx_handle_exit+0x103/0x1010 [kvm_intel] >> >> ? kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x1628/0x2e20 [kvm] >> >> >> >> The commit avoids to load host state of vmcs12 as vmcs01's guest state >> >> since vmcs12 is not modified (except for the VM-instruction error >> >> field) >> >> if the checking of vmcs control area fails. However, the mmu context is >> >> switched to nested mmu in prepare_vmcs02() and it will not be reloaded >> >> since load_vmcs12_host_state() is skipped when nested VMLAUNCH/VMRESUME >> >> fails. This patch fixes it by reloading mmu context when nested >> >> VMLAUNCH/VMRESUME fails. >> >> >> >> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Cc: Jim Mattson <jmattson@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> --- >> >> v3 -> v4: >> >> * move it to a new function load_vmcs12_mmu_host_state >> >> >> >> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------ >> >> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) >> >> >> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c >> >> index 6cf3972..8aefb91 100644 >> >> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c >> >> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c >> >> @@ -11259,6 +11259,24 @@ static void prepare_vmcs12(struct kvm_vcpu >> *vcpu, >> >> struct vmcs12 *vmcs12, >> >> kvm_clear_interrupt_queue(vcpu); >> >> } >> >> +static void load_vmcs12_mmu_host_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, >> >> + struct vmcs12 *vmcs12) >> >> +{ >> >> + u32 entry_failure_code; >> >> + >> >> + nested_ept_uninit_mmu_context(vcpu); >> >> + >> >> + /* >> >> + * Only PDPTE load can fail as the value of cr3 was checked on >> >> entry and >> >> + * couldn't have changed. >> >> + */ >> >> + if (nested_vmx_load_cr3(vcpu, vmcs12->host_cr3, false, >> >> &entry_failure_code)) >> >> + nested_vmx_abort(vcpu, VMX_ABORT_LOAD_HOST_PDPTE_FAIL); >> >> + >> >> + if (!enable_ept) >> >> + vcpu->arch.walk_mmu->inject_page_fault = >> >> kvm_inject_page_fault; >> >> +} >> >> + >> >> /* >> >> * A part of what we need to when the nested L2 guest exits and we >> want >> >> to >> >> * run its L1 parent, is to reset L1's guest state to the host state >> >> specified >> >> @@ -11272,7 +11290,6 @@ static void load_vmcs12_host_state(struct >> kvm_vcpu >> >> *vcpu, >> >> struct vmcs12 *vmcs12) >> >> { >> >> struct kvm_segment seg; >> >> - u32 entry_failure_code; >> >> if (vmcs12->vm_exit_controls & VM_EXIT_LOAD_IA32_EFER) >> >> vcpu->arch.efer = vmcs12->host_ia32_efer; >> >> @@ -11299,17 +11316,7 @@ static void load_vmcs12_host_state(struct >> >> kvm_vcpu *vcpu, >> >> vcpu->arch.cr4_guest_owned_bits = >> >> ~vmcs_readl(CR4_GUEST_HOST_MASK); >> >> vmx_set_cr4(vcpu, vmcs12->host_cr4); >> >> - nested_ept_uninit_mmu_context(vcpu); >> >> - >> >> - /* >> >> - * Only PDPTE load can fail as the value of cr3 was checked on >> >> entry and >> >> - * couldn't have changed. >> >> - */ >> >> - if (nested_vmx_load_cr3(vcpu, vmcs12->host_cr3, false, >> >> &entry_failure_code)) >> >> - nested_vmx_abort(vcpu, VMX_ABORT_LOAD_HOST_PDPTE_FAIL); >> >> - >> >> - if (!enable_ept) >> >> - vcpu->arch.walk_mmu->inject_page_fault = >> >> kvm_inject_page_fault; >> >> + load_vmcs12_mmu_host_state(vcpu, vmcs12); >> >> if (enable_vpid) { >> >> /* >> >> @@ -11539,6 +11546,9 @@ static void nested_vmx_vmexit(struct kvm_vcpu >> >> *vcpu, u32 exit_reason, >> >> * accordingly. >> >> */ >> >> nested_vmx_failValid(vcpu, VMXERR_ENTRY_INVALID_CONTROL_FIELD); >> >> + >> >> + load_vmcs12_mmu_host_state(vcpu, vmcs12); >> >> + >> >> /* >> >> * The emulated instruction was already skipped in >> >> * nested_vmx_run, but the updated RIP was never >> > >> > Reviewed-by: Krish Sadhukhan <krish.sadhukhan@xxxxxxxxxx> > >