Re: [RFC] CPU hard limits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 2:59 AM, Dhaval Giani<dhaval@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I think we are focusing on the wrong use case here. Guarantees is just a
> useful side-effect we get by using hard limits. I think the more
> important use case is where the provider wants to limit the amount of
> time a user gets (such as in a cloud).
>
> Maybe we should direct our attention in solving that problem? :)
>

Yes, that case and the "predictable load test behaviour" case are both
good reasons for hard limits.

Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux