Re: [PATCH v4 03/15] KVM: s390: refactor crypto initialization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 09:49:58 +0200
"Harald Freudenberger" <FREUDE@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Didn't we say that when APXA is not available there is no Crypto support
> for KVM ?

[Going by the code, as I don't have access to the architecture]

Current status seems to be:
- setup crycb if facility 76 is available (that's MSAX3, I guess?)
- use format 2 if APXA is available, else use format 1

>From Tony's patch description, the goal seems to be:
- setup crycb even if MSAX3 is not available

So my understanding is that we use APXA only to decide on the format of
the crycb, but provide it in any case?

(Not providing a crycb if APXA is not available would be loss of
functionality, I guess? Deciding not to provide vfio-ap if APXA is not
available is a different game, of course.)



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux