Re: [PATCH] kvm: Add emulation for movups/movupd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/04/2018 17:54, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> This is very similar to the aligned versions movaps/movapd.
> 
> We have seen the corresponding emulation failures with openbsd as guest
> and with Windows 10 with intel HD graphics pass through.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt <christian_ehrhardt@xxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Fritsch <sf@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 8 +++++++-
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> index d91eaeb01034..7dda8e38c19a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> @@ -4498,6 +4498,10 @@ static const struct gprefix pfx_0f_2b = {
>  	ID(0, &instr_dual_0f_2b), ID(0, &instr_dual_0f_2b), N, N,
>  };
>  
> +static const struct gprefix pfx_0f_10_0f_11 = {
> +	I(Unaligned, em_mov), I(Unaligned, em_mov), N, N,
> +};
> +
>  static const struct gprefix pfx_0f_28_0f_29 = {
>  	I(Aligned, em_mov), I(Aligned, em_mov), N, N,
>  };
> @@ -4709,7 +4713,9 @@ static const struct opcode twobyte_table[256] = {
>  	DI(ImplicitOps | Priv, invd), DI(ImplicitOps | Priv, wbinvd), N, N,
>  	N, D(ImplicitOps | ModRM | SrcMem | NoAccess), N, N,
>  	/* 0x10 - 0x1F */
> -	N, N, N, N, N, N, N, N,
> +	GP(ModRM | DstReg | SrcMem | Mov | Sse, &pfx_0f_10_0f_11),
> +	GP(ModRM | DstMem | SrcReg | Mov | Sse, &pfx_0f_10_0f_11),
> +	N, N, N, N, N, N,
>  	D(ImplicitOps | ModRM | SrcMem | NoAccess),
>  	N, N, N, N, N, N, D(ImplicitOps | ModRM | SrcMem | NoAccess),
>  	/* 0x20 - 0x2F */
> 

Applied, thanks.

Paolo



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux