Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 0/8] s390x: Extend s390x coverage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 27.03.2018 13:55, Janosch Frank wrote:
> The IBM team wants to join in on testing s390x KVM thoroughly, so I
> prepared a lot of memory related tests and some IBM z14 related tests.
> 
> v3:
> 	* Merged sthyi inline assembly and improved report messages
> 	* Cosmetical fixes
> 	* Other inline assembly fixes
> 
> v2:
> 	* Improved inline assembly for gs and vector tests
> 	* Improved test skipping messages for tests needing specific
>           failities
> 	* General improvements from review
> 
> Janosch Frank (8):
>   s390x: Add sthyi tests
>   s390x: Add privileged operation exceptions handling
>   s390x: Add storage keys tests
>   s390x: Add diag10 tests
>   s390x: Add pfmf tests
>   s390x: Add cmm tests
>   s390x: Add vector tests
>   s390x: Add simple guarded storage tests
> 
>  lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h |  28 ++++++++
>  lib/s390x/asm/mem.h      |  52 +++++++++++++++
>  lib/s390x/interrupt.c    |   7 ++
>  s390x/Makefile           |   7 ++
>  s390x/cmm.c              |  69 +++++++++++++++++++
>  s390x/diag10.c           |  81 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  s390x/gs.c               | 170 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  s390x/pfmf.c             | 144 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  s390x/skey.c             |  94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  s390x/sthyi.c            | 169 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  s390x/sthyi.h            | 131 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  s390x/unittests.cfg      |  21 ++++++
>  s390x/vector.c           | 134 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  13 files changed, 1107 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 lib/s390x/asm/mem.h
>  create mode 100644 s390x/cmm.c
>  create mode 100644 s390x/diag10.c
>  create mode 100644 s390x/gs.c
>  create mode 100644 s390x/pfmf.c
>  create mode 100644 s390x/skey.c
>  create mode 100644 s390x/sthyi.c
>  create mode 100644 s390x/sthyi.h
>  create mode 100644 s390x/vector.c
> 

In general, looks good to me. But I somewhat dislike creating so many
new test.

Can we at least merge pfmf+skey and maybe move sthyi+diag10+(cmm) to
intercept.c?

Any good reasons to keep it separated? I agree that things like
vx/gs/skey can remain isolated - they test isolated features/functionality.

Thanks!

-- 

Thanks,

David / dhildenb



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux