On 13/03/2018 18:48, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > Changes since v1: > - Merged patches 1 and 2, skip savesegment() for FS and FS for x86_64 > as save_fsgs() already does that [Paolo Bonzini] > - Rename save_current_fsgs() -> save_fsgs_for_kvm() [Andy Lutomirski] > - Trimmed comments [Andy Lutomirski] > - Add Andy's A-b to what is now PATCH2 > > Some time ago Paolo suggested to take a look at probably unneeded expensive > rdmsrs for FS/GS base MSR in vmx_save_host_state(). This is called on every > vcpu run when we need to handle vmexit in userspace. > > vmx_save_host_state() is always called in a very well defined context > (ioctl from userspace) so we may try to get the required values for FS/GS > bases from in-kernel variables and avoid expensive rdmsrs. > > My debug shows we're shaving off 240 cpu cycles (E5-2603 v3). > > Vitaly Kuznetsov (2): > x86/kvm/vmx: read MSR_{FS,KERNEL_GS}_BASE from current->thread > x86/kvm/vmx: avoid expensive rdmsr for MSR_GS_BASE > > arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 10 ++++++++++ > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 3 ++- > arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ > arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 16 ++++++++++++---- > 4 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > Queued, thanks. Paolo