On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 3:49 PM, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 2:57 PM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 02:21:40PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote: >>> They are indeed a hodge-podge. The problem is that the current >>> IS_DAX() is broken. So I'd like to propose fixing IS_DAX() with >>> IS_FSDAX() + IS_DEVDAX() for 4.16-rc4 and queue up these wider reworks >>> you propose for the next merge window. >> >> The only thing broken about IS_DAX are the code elimination games >> based on the CONFIG_* flags. Remove those and just add proper stubs >> for the dax routines and everything will be fine for now until we can >> kill that inode flag. >> >> IS_FSDAX and IS_DEVDAX on the other hand are a giant mess that isn't >> helping anyone. > > Ok, I'll take another shot at something suitable for 4.16, but without > these new helpers... I'll drop patches 2-11 for now, and just get the high priority fixes in for the next rc.
