Re: [PATCH RFC 3/6] KVM: s390: consider epoch index on hotplugged CPUs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/07/2018 12:46 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> We must copy both, the epoch and the epoch_idx.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks applied. Deserves a cc stable I think.

> ---
>  arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> index b514ee427077..d007b737cd4d 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> @@ -2387,6 +2387,7 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_postcreate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	mutex_lock(&vcpu->kvm->lock);
>  	preempt_disable();
>  	vcpu->arch.sie_block->epoch = vcpu->kvm->arch.epoch;
> +	vcpu->arch.sie_block->epdx = vcpu->kvm->arch.epdx;
>  	preempt_enable();
>  	mutex_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->lock);
>  	if (!kvm_is_ucontrol(vcpu->kvm)) {
> 




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux