Re: [PATCH RFC 6/6] KVM: s390: generalize kvm_s390_get_tod_clock_ext()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 15.02.2018 15:08, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Wed,  7 Feb 2018 12:46:47 +0100
> David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> Move the Multiple-epoch facility handling into it and rename it to
>> kvm_s390_get_tod_clock().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 22 +++++++++-------------
>>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> Looks correct, but I'm not sure what this buys us?

That we have functions that can be called without having to care about
multiple epoch facility

Namely

kvm_s390_set_tod_clock()
kvm_s390_get_tod_clock()
kvm_s390_get_tod_clock_fast()

-- 

Thanks,

David / dhildenb



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux