On 14/02/2018 13:44, Andrew Jones wrote: > Yeah, IMO it'd be nice to completely kill libcflat.h. I'm not sure how > many user input type functions we'll add to the framework, so I'm a bit > concerned userinput.h will be a one prototype header. Well, unless you > want to throw command line parsing in there too. How about we try to > better use the concept of util.h? Maybe rename it to test-util.h or > something else (userinput.h?) first? test-util.[hc] gets my vote. Paolo
