On 02/07/2018 06:46 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
Missed when enabling the Multiple-epoch facility. If the facility is
installed and the control is set, a sign based comaprison has to be
performed.
Right now we would inject wrong interrupts and ignore interrupt
conditions. Also the sleep time is calculated in a wrong way.
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand<david@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
index 3ea9cfa31b16..a616e9b65f91 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
@@ -169,8 +169,15 @@ static int ckc_interrupts_enabled(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
static int ckc_irq_pending(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->ckc >= kvm_s390_get_tod_clock_fast(vcpu->kvm))
+ const u64 now = kvm_s390_get_tod_clock_fast(vcpu->kvm);
+ const u64 ckc = vcpu->arch.sie_block->ckc;
+
+ if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gcr[0] & 0x0020000000000000ul) {
+ if ((s64)ckc >= (s64)now)
+ return 0;
+ } else if (ckc >= now) {
return 0;
+ }
return ckc_interrupts_enabled(vcpu);
}
@@ -1042,13 +1049,19 @@ int kvm_cpu_has_pending_timer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
static u64 __calculate_sltime(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- u64 now, cputm, sltime = 0;
+ const u64 now = kvm_s390_get_tod_clock_fast(vcpu->kvm);
+ const u64 ckc = vcpu->arch.sie_block->ckc;
+ u64 cputm, sltime = 0;
if (ckc_interrupts_enabled(vcpu)) {
- now = kvm_s390_get_tod_clock_fast(vcpu->kvm);
- sltime = tod_to_ns(vcpu->arch.sie_block->ckc - now);
- /* already expired or overflow? */
- if (!sltime || vcpu->arch.sie_block->ckc <= now)
+ if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gcr[0] & 0x0020000000000000ul) {
+ if ((s64)now < (s64)ckc)
+ sltime = tod_to_ns((s64)ckc - (s64)now);
+ } else if (now < ckc) {
+ sltime = tod_to_ns(ckc - now);
+ }
+ /* already expired */
+ if (!sltime)
return 0;
if (cpu_timer_interrupts_enabled(vcpu)) {
cputm = kvm_s390_get_cpu_timer(vcpu);
I think it would assist with readability if you defined the sign
comparison bit. Seeing
something that yells "SIGNED" would make sense as to what's going on here.
Other than that, I don't see anything wrong.
I'll get to reviewing the rest of these patches throughout the day. I
have to revisit
the docs :)
--
- Collin L Walling
