Re: [PATCH 0/2] KVM: s390: avoid jump tables

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06.02.2018 12:21, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Some old patches refreshed.
> 

Certainly the right thing to do. Especially also interesting due to
retpotline (if we get something like that on s390x). If I remember
correctly, x86 highly benefits by replacing magic function pointer by
switch statements.

Should we go ahead and also rework interrupt delivery?

> Christian Borntraeger (2):
>   KVM: s390: use switch vs jump table in priv.c
>   KVM: s390: use switch vs jump table in intercept.c
> 
>  arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c |  54 +++++++-------
>  arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h  |   2 -
>  arch/s390/kvm/priv.c      | 183 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>  3 files changed, 119 insertions(+), 120 deletions(-)
> 


-- 

Thanks,

David / dhildenb



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux