Re: [PATCH 1/2] iommu: Fix iommu_unmap and iommu_unmap_fast return type

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Robin,

On 2/1/18 1:02 AM, Robin Murphy wrote:
Hi Suravee,

On 31/01/18 01:48, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
Currently, iommu_unmap and iommu_unmap_fast return unmapped
pages with size_t.  However, the actual value returned could
be error codes (< 0), which can be misinterpreted as large
number of unmapped pages. Therefore, change the return type to ssize_t.

Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@xxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c   |  6 +++---
  drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c |  4 ++--

Er, there are a few more drivers than that implementing iommu_ops ;)

Ahh right.

It seems like it might be more sensible to fix the single instance of a driver returning -EINVAL (which appears to be a "should never happen if used correctly" kinda thing anyway) and leave the API-internal callback prototype as-is. I do agree the inconsistency of iommu_unmap() itself wants sorting, though (particularly the !IOMMU_API stubs which are wrong either way).

Robin.

Make sense. I'll leave the API alone, and change the code to not returning error then.
There are a few places to fix.

Thanks,
Suravee



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux