Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] KVM: x86: Add IBPB support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/31/2018 05:55 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 31/01/2018 11:50, Jim Mattson wrote:
+       if (to_vmx(vcpu)->save_spec_ctrl_on_exit) {
+               nested_vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(
+                               msr_bitmap_l1, msr_bitmap_l0,
+                               MSR_IA32_PRED_CMD,
+                               MSR_TYPE_R);
+       }
I don't think this should be predicated on
"to_vmx(vcpu)->save_spec_ctrl_on_exit." Why not just
"guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_IBPB)"? Also, the final argument to
nested_vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr should be MSR_TYPE_W rather than
MSR_TYPE_R.

In fact this MSR can even be passed down unconditionally, since it needs
no save/restore and has no ill performance effect on the sibling
hyperthread.

Only MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL needs to be conditional on
"to_vmx(vcpu)->save_spec_ctrl_on_exit".

That used to be the case in an earlier version. There seems to be two
opinions here:

1) Pass it only if CPUID for the guest has it.
2) Pass it unconditionally.

I do not really have a preference.



Paolo

Amazon Development Center Germany GmbH
Berlin - Dresden - Aachen
main office: Krausenstr. 38, 10117 Berlin
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Dr. Ralf Herbrich, Christian Schlaeger
Ust-ID: DE289237879
Eingetragen am Amtsgericht Charlottenburg HRB 149173 B




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux