RE: [RFC v2 4/5] vfio/type1: Add IOVA range capability support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Auger Eric [mailto:eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2018 11:17 AM
> To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx; pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Linuxarm
> <linuxarm@xxxxxxxxxx>; John Garry <john.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>; xuwei (O)
> <xuwei5@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [RFC v2 4/5] vfio/type1: Add IOVA range capability support
> 
> Hi Shameer,
> 
> On 12/01/18 17:45, Shameer Kolothum wrote:
> > This  allows the user-space to retrieve the supported IOVA range(s),
> > excluding any reserved regions. The implementation is based on
> > capability chains, added to VFIO_IOMMU_GET_INFO ioctl.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 91
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/uapi/linux/vfio.h       | 23 +++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 114 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> > b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c index 47ea490..dc6ed85 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> > @@ -1893,6 +1893,67 @@ static int
> vfio_domains_have_iommu_cache(struct vfio_iommu *iommu)
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> >
> > +static int vfio_add_iova_cap(struct vfio_info_cap *caps, void
> > +*cap_type,
> can't you pass cap_type directly as a struct vfio_iommu_type1_info_cap_iova?
> 
> Also maybe using more explicit name for cap_type such as cap_iova_ranges?
> > +			     size_t size)
> > +{
> > +	struct vfio_info_cap_header *header;
> > +	struct vfio_iommu_type1_info_cap_iova *iova_cap, *iova = cap_type;
> > +
> > +	header = vfio_info_cap_add(caps, size,
> > +				VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1_INFO_CAP_IOVA, 1);
> > +	if (IS_ERR(header))
> > +		return PTR_ERR(header);
> > +
> > +	iova_cap = container_of(header,
> > +			struct vfio_iommu_type1_info_cap_iova, header);
> > +	iova_cap->nr_iovas = iova->nr_iovas;
> > +	memcpy(iova_cap->iova_ranges, iova->iova_ranges,
> > +			iova->nr_iovas * sizeof(*iova->iova_ranges));
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int vfio_build_iommu_iova_caps(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> > +				struct vfio_info_cap *caps)
> > +{
> > +	struct vfio_iommu_type1_info_cap_iova *iova_cap;
> > +	struct vfio_iova *iova;
> > +	size_t size;
> > +	int iovas = 0, i = 0, ret;
> > +
> > +	mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
> > +
> > +	list_for_each_entry(iova, &iommu->iova_list, list)
> > +		iovas++;
> > +
> > +	if (!iovas) {
> > +		ret = EINVAL;
> > +		goto out_unlock;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	size = sizeof(*iova_cap) + (iovas * sizeof(*iova_cap->iova_ranges));
> > +
> > +	iova_cap = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	if (!iova_cap) {
> > +		ret = -ENOMEM;
> > +		goto out_unlock;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	iova_cap->nr_iovas = iovas;
> > +
> > +	list_for_each_entry(iova, &iommu->iova_list, list) {
> > +		iova_cap->iova_ranges[i].start = iova->start;
> > +		iova_cap->iova_ranges[i].end = iova->end;
> > +		i++;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	ret = vfio_add_iova_cap(caps, iova_cap, size);
> > +
> > +	kfree(iova_cap);
> > +out_unlock:
> > +	mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static long vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl(void *iommu_data,
> >  				   unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)  { @@ -
> 1914,6 +1975,8 @@
> > static long vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl(void *iommu_data,
> >  		}
> >  	} else if (cmd == VFIO_IOMMU_GET_INFO) {
> >  		struct vfio_iommu_type1_info info;
> > +		struct vfio_info_cap caps = { .buf = NULL, .size = 0 };
> > +		int ret;
> >
> >  		minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_iommu_type1_info,
> iova_pgsizes);
> >
> > @@ -1927,6 +1990,34 @@ static long vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl(void
> > *iommu_data,
> >
> >  		info.iova_pgsizes = vfio_pgsize_bitmap(iommu);
> >
> > +		if (info.argsz == minsz)
> > +			goto done;
> > +
> > +		ret = vfio_build_iommu_iova_caps(iommu, &caps);
> > +		if (ret)
> > +			return ret;
> > +
> > +		if (caps.size) {
> > +			info.flags |= VFIO_IOMMU_INFO_CAPS;
> > +			minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_iommu_type1_info,
> > +							 cap_offset);
> > +			if (info.argsz < sizeof(info) + caps.size) {
> > +				info.argsz = sizeof(info) + caps.size;
> > +				info.cap_offset = 0;
> > +			} else {
> > +				vfio_info_cap_shift(&caps, sizeof(info));
> > +				if (copy_to_user((void __user *)arg +
> > +						sizeof(info), caps.buf,
> > +						caps.size)) {
> > +					kfree(caps.buf);
> > +					return -EFAULT;
> > +				}
> > +				info.cap_offset = sizeof(info);
> > +			}
> > +
> > +			kfree(caps.buf);
> > +		}
> > +done:
> >  		return copy_to_user((void __user *)arg, &info, minsz) ?
> >  			-EFAULT : 0;
> >
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> > index e3301db..8671448 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> > @@ -517,7 +517,30 @@ struct vfio_iommu_type1_info {
> >  	__u32	argsz;
> >  	__u32	flags;
> >  #define VFIO_IOMMU_INFO_PGSIZES (1 << 0)	/* supported page sizes info */
> > +#define VFIO_IOMMU_INFO_CAPS	(1 << 1)	/* Info supports caps */
> >  	__u64	iova_pgsizes;		/* Bitmap of supported page sizes */
> > +	__u32   cap_offset;	/* Offset within info struct of first cap */
> > +};
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * The IOVA capability allows to report the valid IOVA range(s)
> > + * excluding any reserved regions associated with dev group. Any dma
> > + * map attempt outside the valid iova range will return error.
> > + *
> > + * The structures below define version 1 of this capability.
> > + */
> > +#define VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1_INFO_CAP_IOVA  1
> VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1_INFO_CAP_IOVA_RANGE ?
> > +
> > +struct vfio_iova_range {
> > +	__u64	start;
> > +	__u64	end;
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct vfio_iommu_type1_info_cap_iova {
> cap_iova_ranges?
> > +	struct vfio_info_cap_header header;
> > +	__u32	nr_iovas;
> > +	__u32	reserved;
> > +	struct vfio_iova_range iova_ranges[];
> >  };
> >
> >  #define VFIO_IOMMU_GET_INFO _IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 12)
> >
> Otherwise looks good to me.

Ok. I will take care of them.

Thanks,
Shameer

> Thanks
> 
> Eric



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux