On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 22:43:24 +0100 Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Conny can you review and ack as well? > > Paolo, Radim, > > As the other patches need to sync on the ifetch/nospec/gmb naming I have changed my mind. :-) > This patch is independent from the other patches (as it just provides the guest facilities not caring > about what the host does). > > It seems that you do a kvm pull request for 4.15 anyway (for power), so it might make sense to > apply this patch as well for 4.15. this will make it easier to also upstream the QEMU part in time > as we need the uabi interfaces. Indeed, there is no real dependency. I am thinking about doing a split of my patches as well, everything but the gmb/nospec_xxx/ifetch/isync/whatever part. The prctl part needs some more discussion, as will prepare a patch. Or two. -- blue skies, Martin. "Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
