Uri Lublin wrote: > Hi David, > > I'm not sure this patch-set makes development much easier, as it only > saves adding one line (entry) in test_routines table, but is less > flexible (e.g. force file-name and function-name of test routines). > > Moving the test to a separate kvm_tests directory can be done without > dynamic load of the tests. > > I don't have strong feelings about it though. > > What others think ? > > Thanks, > Uri. Uri, Thanks for the feedback, Lucas and I had a brief discussion about this last week so I just wanted to repost what I already had just as a starting point for a discussion on this topic, I know my patches are rough. Our thinking is that it would be nice to be able to drop new tests in to a kvm_test dir, modify the config file, and not have to "update" the kvm_auottest or autotest binarys. However I would also like to hear others opinions on this... -D -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
