On 11/01/2018 00:01, Liran Alon wrote: > > ----- jmattson@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >> Liran, Are you planning to submit reverts for ae1f57670703 and >> ac9b305caa0d? > > Yes. > I just didn't had time to deal with this as I was busy with other Oracle Ravello specific issues. > I think reverting both commits is the right thing to do. > > Paolo: Note that the VMware Backdoor support series we have patched here (was not yet queued) is based a bit on the code of this commit. Do you wish me to first wait that those patches will be queued and then I will create the revert for these (and resolve relevant conflicts) or that I will create the reverts for these on top of what is currently queued and you will resolve the conflicts resulting when applying VMware Backdoor support series? I can take care of the reverts, but you'll have to repost the backdoor series. Unfortunately due to my involvement with Spectre in Red Hat (and Radim's vacation :)) I have fallen short on the review backlog. Paolo
