On 19.12.2017 18:33, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 19.12.2017 18:26, Jim Mattson wrote: >> Yes, it can be done that way, but what makes this approach technically >> superior to the original API? > > a) not having to migrate data twice > b) not having to think about a proper API to get data in/out > > All you need to know is, if the guest was in nested mode when migrating, > no? That would be a simple flag. > (of course in addition, vmcsptr and if vmxon has been called). But anyhow, if you have good reasons why you want to introduce and maintain a new API, feel free to do so. Most likely I am missing something important here :) -- Thanks, David / dhildenb
