On 19/12/2017 03:40, Haozhong Zhang wrote: >> As discussed in the reply to v2, this should include WC too. The >> function name could become something like pat_pfn_downgraded_by_uc_mtrr. > > Or shall we just expose lookup_memtype(), and keep all other logic in > KVM? The function name still looks strange somehow, and the check of > memory type makes more sense and would be easier to understand in the > context of KVM. I agree that it's a bit strange, but I don't want to go against the suggestions of the x86 maintainer. Paolo
