https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=197861 --- Comment #9 from Willem de Bruijn (willemb@xxxxxxxxxx) --- Yes, I mean that if that revert fixes it, then this patch is the cause. Then it would be helpful to see whether it is due to those more stringent precondition checks and, if so, which codepath it is that leads to this function with an skb that does not match those checks. Existing code should pass them too, even if the checks where not there in practice before. Sorry for the confusion. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.
