On 11/12/2017 10:19, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 05:26:02PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_get_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_regs *regs)
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
>>> index f647e121070e..cdf0be02c95a 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
>>> @@ -1632,18 +1632,25 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_sregs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>> {
>>> int ret;
>>>
>>> + vcpu_load(vcpu);
>>> +
>>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>>
>> you can initialize this directly.
>>
>>> if (vcpu->arch.pvr != sregs->pvr)
>>> - return -EINVAL;
>>> + goto out;
>>>
>>> ret = set_sregs_base(vcpu, sregs);
>>> if (ret < 0)
>>> - return ret;
>>> + goto out;
>>>
>>> ret = set_sregs_arch206(vcpu, sregs);
>>> if (ret < 0)
>>> - return ret;
>>> + goto out;
>>> +
>>> + ret = vcpu->kvm->arch.kvm_ops->set_sregs(vcpu, sregs);
>>>
>>> - return vcpu->kvm->arch.kvm_ops->set_sregs(vcpu, sregs);
>>> +out:
>>> + vcpu_put(vcpu);
>>> + return ret;
>>> }
>>>
>>> int kvmppc_get_one_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 id,
>>> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
>>> index 18011fc4ac49..d95b4f15e52b 100644
>>> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
>>> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
>>> @@ -2729,8 +2729,12 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_get_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_regs *regs)
>>> int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_sregs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>> struct kvm_sregs *sregs)
>>> {
>>> + vcpu_load(vcpu);
>>> +
>>> memcpy(&vcpu->run->s.regs.acrs, &sregs->acrs, sizeof(sregs->acrs));
>>> memcpy(&vcpu->arch.sie_block->gcr, &sregs->crs, sizeof(sregs->crs));
>>> +
>>> + vcpu_put(vcpu);
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>>> index 20a5f6776eea..a31a80aee0b9 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>>> @@ -7500,15 +7500,19 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_sregs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>> int mmu_reset_needed = 0;
>>> int pending_vec, max_bits, idx;
>>> struct desc_ptr dt;
>>> + int ret;
>>> +
>>> + vcpu_load(vcpu);
>>>
>>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>>
>> dito
>
> Sure.
I'm doing it when applying.
Paolo
>> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
