Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] kvm:x86: factor out kvm.arch.hyperv (de)init

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07.12.2017 15:18, Roman Kagan wrote:
> Move kvm.arch.hyperv initialization and cleanup to separate functions.
> 
> For now only a mutex is inited in the former, and the latter is empty;
> more stuff will go in there in a followup patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roman Kagan <rkagan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v1 -> v2:
>  - fix subject prefix

should be "kvm: x86: " ;)

> 
>  arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.h | 3 +++
>  arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c | 9 +++++++++
>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c    | 4 +++-
>  3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.h b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.h
> index e637631a9574..cc2468244ca2 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.h
> @@ -88,4 +88,7 @@ void kvm_hv_process_stimers(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  void kvm_hv_setup_tsc_page(struct kvm *kvm,
>  			   struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info *hv_clock);
>  
> +void kvm_hv_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm);
> +void kvm_hv_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm);
> +
>  #endif
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
> index dc97f2544b6f..015fb06c7522 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
> @@ -1301,3 +1301,12 @@ int kvm_hv_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	kvm_hv_hypercall_set_result(vcpu, ret);
>  	return 1;
>  }
> +
> +void kvm_hv_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> +	mutex_init(&kvm->arch.hyperv.hv_lock);
> +}
> +
> +void kvm_hv_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> +}
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index eee8e7faf1af..db130b7030e7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -8149,7 +8149,6 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
>  
>  	raw_spin_lock_init(&kvm->arch.tsc_write_lock);
>  	mutex_init(&kvm->arch.apic_map_lock);
> -	mutex_init(&kvm->arch.hyperv.hv_lock);
>  	spin_lock_init(&kvm->arch.pvclock_gtod_sync_lock);
>  
>  	kvm->arch.kvmclock_offset = -ktime_get_boot_ns();
> @@ -8158,6 +8157,8 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
>  	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&kvm->arch.kvmclock_update_work, kvmclock_update_fn);
>  	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&kvm->arch.kvmclock_sync_work, kvmclock_sync_fn);
>  
> +	kvm_hv_init_vm(kvm);
> +

wonder if that empty line is really needed.

>  	kvm_page_track_init(kvm);
>  	kvm_mmu_init_vm(kvm);
>  
> @@ -8292,6 +8293,7 @@ void kvm_arch_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
>  	kvfree(rcu_dereference_check(kvm->arch.apic_map, 1));
>  	kvm_mmu_uninit_vm(kvm);
>  	kvm_page_track_cleanup(kvm);
> +	kvm_hv_destroy_vm(kvm);
>  }
>  
>  void kvm_arch_free_memslot(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *free,
> 

Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 

Thanks,

David / dhildenb



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux