Re: [PATCH 0/1] x2apic implementation for kvm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sheng Yang wrote:
OK, you are totally talking about PV. For PV, I think let host kernel accept the modification is more important here. (And for PV, using hypercall seems more directly).

Microsoft already defined their interfaces, and they use MSRs (but a different range from x2apic).

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux