Does roughly what kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_page did before.
I am not certain why this would be needed. It might mean that we have
another bug with start/end or just that I missed something.
Please try just [1/2] first and apply this one only if [1/2] still bugs,
thanks!
---
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index b7f4689e373f..0825ea624f16 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -342,6 +342,29 @@ static void kvm_mmu_notifier_change_pte(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
}
+static void kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
+ struct mm_struct *mm,
+ unsigned long start,
+ unsigned long end)
+{
+ struct kvm *kvm = mmu_notifier_to_kvm(mn);
+ int need_tlb_flush = 0, idx;
+
+ idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
+ spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+ kvm->mmu_notifier_seq++;
+ need_tlb_flush = kvm_unmap_hva_range(kvm, start, end);
+ need_tlb_flush |= kvm->tlbs_dirty;
+ if (need_tlb_flush)
+ kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
+
+ spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+
+ kvm_arch_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range(kvm, start, end);
+
+ srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
+}
+
static void kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
struct mm_struct *mm,
unsigned long start,
@@ -476,6 +499,7 @@ static void kvm_mmu_notifier_release(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
}
static const struct mmu_notifier_ops kvm_mmu_notifier_ops = {
+ .invalidate_range = kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range,
.invalidate_range_start = kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start,
.invalidate_range_end = kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end,
.clear_flush_young = kvm_mmu_notifier_clear_flush_young,
--
2.14.2
