On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 2:35 AM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> They came from the submaintainers' tree, so technically it wasn't in *my*
> linux-next tree; if you looked at "linux-next as of the kvm/linux-next merge",
> you wouldn't have found them. But they were not rebased at least between
> 20171113 and 20171117:
I don't look into specific branches, I looked just at the status at 20171117.
Basically I do a fetch of the requested branch, and then check what is
in the fetch that wasn't in next-20171117. There was a lot there,
which is why I complained.
Linus
