On 27/11/2017 18:17, Jim Mattson wrote: > Mark was kind enough to upstream my change for me. Ok, then it should have you as the author. I'll fix that. Paolo > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 8:59 AM, David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 21.11.2017 18:22, Mark Kanda wrote: >>> The potential performance advantages of a vmcs02 pool have never been >>> realized. To simplify the code, eliminate the pool. Instead, a single >>> vmcs02 is allocated per VCPU when the VCPU enters VMX operation. >> >> Did you do any performance measurement to come to the conclusion that we >> can remove it? :) >> >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> -> why is that in here? >> >>> Signed-off-by: Mark Kanda <mark.kanda@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Reviewed-by: Ameya More <ameya.more@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 146 >> >> -- >> >> Thanks, >> >> David / dhildenb
