Re: [PATCH 35/37] KVM: arm/arm64: Get rid of vgic_elrsr

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 12:41:39PM +0200, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> There is really no need to store the vgic_elrsr on the VGIC data
> structures as the only need we have for the elrsr is to figure out if an
> LR is inavtive when we save the VGIC state upon returning from the
> guest.  We can might as well store this in a temporary local variable.
> 
> This also gets rid of the endianness conversion in the VGIC save
> function, which is completely unnecessary and would actually result in
> incorrect functionality on big-endian systems,

Does it mean that existing code in mainline is broken for BE systems?
If so, I think that it should be fixed in separated patch...

> because we are only using
> typed values here and not converting pointers and reading different
> types here.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  include/kvm/arm_vgic.h        |  2 --
>  virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c |  6 +++---
>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v2.c   | 33 +++++++--------------------------
>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c   |  1 -
>  4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> index 34dba51..79c9e67 100644
> --- a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> +++ b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> @@ -237,7 +237,6 @@ struct vgic_dist {
>  struct vgic_v2_cpu_if {
>  	u32		vgic_hcr;
>  	u32		vgic_vmcr;
> -	u64		vgic_elrsr;	/* Saved only */
>  	u32		vgic_apr;
>  	u32		vgic_lr[VGIC_V2_MAX_LRS];
>  };
> @@ -246,7 +245,6 @@ struct vgic_v3_cpu_if {
>  	u32		vgic_hcr;
>  	u32		vgic_vmcr;
>  	u32		vgic_sre;	/* Restored only, change ignored */
> -	u32		vgic_elrsr;	/* Saved only */
>  	u32		vgic_ap0r[4];
>  	u32		vgic_ap1r[4];
>  	u64		vgic_lr[VGIC_V3_MAX_LRS];
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c b/virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c
> index 91728fa..05548b2 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c
> @@ -222,15 +222,16 @@ void __hyp_text __vgic_v3_save_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	if (used_lrs) {
>  		int i;
>  		u32 nr_pre_bits;
> +		u32 elrsr;
>  
> -		cpu_if->vgic_elrsr = read_gicreg(ICH_ELSR_EL2);
> +		elrsr = read_gicreg(ICH_ELSR_EL2);
>  
>  		write_gicreg(0, ICH_HCR_EL2);
>  		val = read_gicreg(ICH_VTR_EL2);
>  		nr_pre_bits = vtr_to_nr_pre_bits(val);
>  
>  		for (i = 0; i < used_lrs; i++) {
> -			if (cpu_if->vgic_elrsr & (1 << i))
> +			if (elrsr & (1 << i))

Same comments as to patch 28. Here should be test_bit(), I think.
And if it's possible, for set bits in elrsr it's simpler not to write
~ICH_LR_STATE to cpu_if->vgic_lr, but directly to IO memory in
__vgic_v3_restore_state().

>  				cpu_if->vgic_lr[i] &= ~ICH_LR_STATE;
>  			else
>  				cpu_if->vgic_lr[i] = __gic_v3_get_lr(i);
> @@ -261,7 +262,6 @@ void __hyp_text __vgic_v3_save_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  		if (static_branch_unlikely(&vgic_v3_cpuif_trap))
>  			write_gicreg(0, ICH_HCR_EL2);
>  
> -		cpu_if->vgic_elrsr = 0xffff;
>  		cpu_if->vgic_ap0r[0] = 0;
>  		cpu_if->vgic_ap0r[1] = 0;
>  		cpu_if->vgic_ap0r[2] = 0;
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v2.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v2.c
> index 259079b..df7e03b 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v2.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v2.c
> @@ -247,7 +247,6 @@ void vgic_v2_enable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	 * anyway.
>  	 */
>  	vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v2.vgic_vmcr = 0;
> -	vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v2.vgic_elrsr = ~0;
>  
>  	/* Get the show on the road... */
>  	vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v2.vgic_hcr = GICH_HCR_EN;
> @@ -404,33 +403,19 @@ int vgic_v2_probe(const struct gic_kvm_info *info)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -static void save_elrsr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, void __iomem *base)
> -{
> -	struct vgic_v2_cpu_if *cpu_if = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v2;
> -	int nr_lr = kvm_vgic_global_state.nr_lr;
> -	u32 elrsr0, elrsr1;
> -
> -	elrsr0 = readl_relaxed(base + GICH_ELRSR0);
> -	if (unlikely(nr_lr > 32))
> -		elrsr1 = readl_relaxed(base + GICH_ELRSR1);
> -	else
> -		elrsr1 = 0;
> -
> -#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN
> -	cpu_if->vgic_elrsr = ((u64)elrsr0 << 32) | elrsr1;
> -#else
> -	cpu_if->vgic_elrsr = ((u64)elrsr1 << 32) | elrsr0;
> -#endif
> -}
> -
>  static void save_lrs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, void __iomem *base)
>  {
>  	struct vgic_v2_cpu_if *cpu_if = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v2;
> -	int i;
>  	u64 used_lrs = vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.used_lrs;

Not to this patch, but anyway, what for to reserve u64 for used_lrs
here and in struct vgic_cpu, when maximum value for it is 64?

> +	u64 elrsr;
> +	int i;

Nit. What for you move 'int i' declaration?

> +
> +	elrsr = readl_relaxed(base + GICH_ELRSR0);
> +	if (unlikely(used_lrs > 32))
> +		elrsr |= ((u64)readl_relaxed(base + GICH_ELRSR1)) << 32;
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < used_lrs; i++) {
> -		if (cpu_if->vgic_elrsr & (1UL << i))
> +		if (elrsr & (1UL << i))

test_bit()

>  			cpu_if->vgic_lr[i] &= ~GICH_LR_STATE;
>  		else
>  			cpu_if->vgic_lr[i] = readl_relaxed(base + GICH_LR0 + (i * 4));
> @@ -452,13 +437,9 @@ void vgic_v2_save_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  
>  	if (used_lrs) {
>  		cpu_if->vgic_apr = readl_relaxed(base + GICH_APR);
> -
> -		save_elrsr(vcpu, base);
>  		save_lrs(vcpu, base);
> -
>  		writel_relaxed(0, base + GICH_HCR);
>  	} else {
> -		cpu_if->vgic_elrsr = ~0UL;
>  		cpu_if->vgic_apr = 0;
>  	}
>  }
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c
> index 863351c..0900649 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c
> @@ -237,7 +237,6 @@ void vgic_v3_enable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	 * anyway.
>  	 */
>  	vgic_v3->vgic_vmcr = 0;
> -	vgic_v3->vgic_elrsr = ~0;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * If we are emulating a GICv3, we do it in an non-GICv2-compatible
> -- 
> 2.9.0



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux