On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 05:43:13PM +0100, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> 2017-11-22 16:52+0100, Marc Haber:
> > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 04:04:42PM +0100, 王金浦 wrote:
> > > So all guest kernels are 4.14, or also other older kernel?
> >
> > Guest kernels are also 4.14, but the issue disappears when the host is
> > downgraded to an older kernel. I therefore reckoned that the guest
> > kernel doesn't matter, but that was before I saw the trace in the log.
>
> The two most suspicious patches since 4.13 (which I assume works) are
>
> 664f8e26b00c ("KVM: X86: Fix loss of exception which has not yet been
> injected")
That one does not revert cleanly, the line in questions seems to have
been removed a bit later.
Reject is:
141 [24/5001]mh@fan:~/linux/git/linux ((v4.14.1) %) $ cat arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c.rej--- arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
+++ arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
@@ -2516,7 +2516,7 @@ static void vmx_queue_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
unsigned nr = vcpu->arch.exception.nr;
bool has_error_code = vcpu->arch.exception.has_error_code;
- bool reinject = vcpu->arch.exception.injected;
+ bool reinject = vcpu->arch.exception.reinject;
u32 error_code = vcpu->arch.exception.error_code;
u32 intr_info = nr | INTR_INFO_VALID_MASK;
>
> and
>
> 9a6e7c39810e ("KVM: async_pf: Fix #DF due to inject "Page not Present"
> and "Page Ready" exceptions simultaneously")
>
> please try reverting them to see if it helps,
That one reverted cleanly. I am now running the new kernel on the
affected machine, and I think that a second machine has joined the
market of being affected.
Would this matter on the host only or on the guests as well?
Greetings
Marc
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Leimen, Germany | lose things." Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 6224 1600402
Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 6224 1600421
